Hey Art, I appreciate your reply and agree that generally best practice of debate and iterative data analysis should involve collaboration between all parties. I was originally planning on reaching out, but the more I dug into the data and found the glaring omissions and misrepresentation of values, as well as additional interviews with this team claiming that fraud was "undeniable", I lost any confidence that there would be any good faith debate. The recklessness with which they posted videos with such dramatic and dangerous claims suggests that their motives are not for informed debate, but rather to sow doubt and misconstrue the truth.